NOTICE:

This notice is actual notice to you and constructive notice to all agencies and agents of government;

I am a Sovereign Citizen, by birthright, acting in my own private capacity but expressly not acting in the capacity of a US citizen who resides in this or any State or any other legal fiction including but not limited to a corporation, body politic, partnership or other unincorporated association.  Nor am I acting in the capacity of a “natural person” or a ‘sovereign citizen’  engaged in one of those capacities. 

I do not consent to talk to you, and I must insist, unless you are placing me under arrest, or can state specific facts which warrant your detaining me that you immediately leave me alone to go about my business, as is my Right protected by the controlling Constitutions

IF YOU DO NOT HAVE PROBABLE CAUSE TO BELIEVE THAT A MALA IN SE: FELONY OR MISDEMEANOR CRIME (the elements of which are “an actual harm to persons or property” “intent” and a “victim”), IS BEING OR HAS BEEN COMMITTED BY ME YOU HAVE NO AUTHORITY WHAT-SO-EVER TO INTERFERE IN MY BUSINESS OR RESTRAIN OR SEARCH MY PERSON OR PROPERTY.  HERE IS WHY;

If you are engaged in the enforcement of an ordinance or administrative regulation; see;

Missouri Court of Appeals Southern District
Case Style: City of Ash Grove, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Ray Ridenour Christian, Defendant-Appellant. Case Number: No. 21161
Handdown Date: 07/22/97

IN PERTINENT PART;

,,,,,,,"The law in Missouri considers violations of municipal ordinances to be civil matters, but requires courts to apply the criminal standard of proof beyond a reasonable doubt because of the quasi-criminal aspects involved." University City v. MAJ Inv. Corp., 884 S.W.2d 306, 307 (Mo.App. 1994).

AS SUCH;  YOU HAVE NO PROBABLE CAUSE TO BELIEVE A CRIME IS OR HAS BEEN COMMITTED AS YOU ARE NOW ENGAGED IN THE ENFORCEMENT OF THE TERMS OF A CIVIL MATTER WITHOUT SPECIFIC KNOWLEDGE THAT I AM PARTY THERETO.  HOWEVER, BY THIS DECLARATION, YOU DO HAVE SPECIFIC KNOWLEDGE OF WHO I CLAIM TO BE

CONSIDER THIS DOCUMENT TO BE ACTUAL NOTICE TO YOU AND CONSTRUCTIVE NOTICE TO YOUR SUPERIORS THAT YOU ARE WITHOUT ALL AUTHORITY REGARDING THIS MATTER AND YOU ARE HEREBY INSTRUCTED BY THIS CITIZEN TO CEASE AND DESIST FURTHER RESTRAINT OF THIS CITIZEN.

I state here and now that I have exercised my unalienable rights in a fashion that is within the meaning and protection of the U. S. Constitution and the original Constitution of this State, EXCLUSIVE OF THAT BODY OF LAW FLOWING FROM THE 14TH AMENDMENT, and beyond that I have no duty to adhere to your or anyone else’s sensibility so long as I harm no one or do not trespass on their rights. (see HALE v. HENKEL, 201 U.S. 43 (1906) (CASE NOT OVERTURNED ON THIS PRINCIPLE)

In addition, as it is my opinion, this detention is completely about converting my money/property to the use of this municipality, city, county and/or state, I inform you that my property is also protected by the Constitutions just mentioned and that my money, my person and prerogative rights are my private property just as the auto is my private property, all of which you are not authorized by me to disturb in any manner whatsoever. I do not choose to nor do I consent to surrender it nor any other right or property protected for me by those Constitutions. 

In addition, be advised that any act on your part to proceed under color of law against me not knowing full well I am party to the contract or engaged in a regulated activity which enables you to enforce traffic laws, ordinances or administrative regulations (unless, there is a real injured party willing to testify that I have done them harm) will be met with an aggressive and protracted and time consuming Court battle before a Jury of MY peers.

I am party to NO contract (visible or invisible, implied in law or otherwise) with corporate body politics in the City of Blue Springs, County of Jackson, State of Missouri, or any other city, county, state in the Union nor the Federal Government. 

I HAVE NO HISTORY OF PHYSICAL VIOLENCE AND AM THEREBY NO THREAT TO YOUR SAFETY AS THAT FACT WILL NOT CHANGE NOW.

(PLEASE READ THIS ENTIRE DOCUMENT PRIOR TO TAKING ANY FURTHER ACTION WHAT-SO-EVER)

I have rescinded any assumed contracts this court or this city may be acting in accordance with from their inception per Affidavit of truth of citizenship status currently filed with the 16th judicial circuit court of Missouri and published at http://www.doprocess.net and www.williamduff.com 

Further, If the process you are about to serve me does not afford me a judicial power trial with a jury of my peers and full due process of law exclusive of all theories of law flowing from the 14th amendment, such process can only be described as a Bill of Attainder which is specifically denied to all agencies of government by the controlling constitutions.

Citations supporting this notice;

"The RIGHT of the citizen to DRIVE on the public street with freedom from police interference, unless he is engaged in suspicious conduct associated in some manner with criminality is a FUNDAMENTAL CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT which must be protected by the courts." People v. Horton 14 Cal. App. 3rd 667 (1971)

"The right of a citizen to travel upon the public highways and to transport his property thereon, by horse-drawn carriage, wagon, or automobile is not a mere privilege which may be permitted or prohibited at will, but a common right which he has under his right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness." Slusher v. Safety Coach Transit Co., 229 Ky 731, 17 SW2d 1012, and affirmed by the Supreme Court in Thompson v. Smith 154 S.E. 579.

Also See:

Cummings v. Missouri 71 U.S. 277 Syllabus

3. A bill of attainder is a legislative act which inflicts punishment without a judicial trial.  If the punishment be less than death, the act is termed [71 U.S. 278] a bill of pains and penalties.  Within the meaning of the Constitution, bills of attainder include bills of pains and penalties.

7. There is no practical difference between assuming the guilt and declaring it.  The deprivation is effected with equal certainty in the one case as in the other.  The legal result is the same, on the principle that what cannot be done directly cannot be done indirectly.

And finally, DO NOT OVERLOOK Davis v. Mississippi, 394 U.S. 721, you are hereby informed regarding the fact that my fingerprints are private property which cannot be taken over my objection without a valid court order and only where a mala in se crime is charged. BE IT NOW RECOGNIZED THAT I DO OBJECT TO THE TAKING OF ANY OF MY PRIVATE PROPERTY.

THESE CASES HAVE NOT BEEN OVERTURNED WITH RESPECT TO THE SOVEREIGN CITIZEN AND ARE THE CONTROLLING LAW ON THE SUBJECT YOU ARE CURRENTLY ENGAGING.  IGNORING THIS NOTICE MAY EXPOSE YOU TO LOSS OF YOUR IMMUNITY FROM PROSECUTION

DO NOT MISS THE ABSOLUTE FACT THAT THIS DETENTION IS A CIVIL MATTER AND AS SUCH THAT NO PROBABLE CAUSE THAT A CRIME IS BEING COMMITED CAN EXIST IN ANY WAY AT ALL;

DO NOT MISS THE ABSOLUTE FACT THAT YOU HAVE NO SPECIFIC KNOWLEDGE THAT I AM PARTY TO ANY CIVIL CONTRACT OF ANY TYPE, THE TERMS OF WHICH YOU ARE ATTEMPTING TO ENFORE HERE;

DO NOT MISS THE ABSOLUTE FACT THAT THE LAWS YOU ARE CURRENTLY ENGAGED IN ENFORCING ARE LIMITED TO FEDERAL CITIZENS RESIDING IN THIS STATE;

DO NOT MISS THE ABSOLUTE FACT THAT I AM NOT A FEDERAL CITIZEN RESIDING IN THIS STATE;

AND FINALLY, DO NOT MISS THE FACT THAT BY THIS WRITING I AM CONTESTING ANY DETERMINATION YOU MAKE WITH REGARD TO ME OR MY PROPERTY UNLESS YOU LEAVE ME ALONE NOW TO GO ABOUT MY BUSINESS.

WILLIAM D DUFF, SOVEREIGN CITIZEN ACTING AS OF RIGHT (SUI JURIS)