SEEKING LIBERTY

2008 William Duff

TAKE THE TEST.

Article by: Joel Turtel : A MUST READ

Here is what others have to say about your property rights:

Now that you recognize the nature of your domain and your dominion over it the real work begins when you attempt to apply these principles to actions taken against you by governments and their subdivisions and agents attempts to compel or prohibit your choice of action respecting subject matter that exists solely within your own private domain.  You now at least have a solid foundation upon which to proceed.  

Now that you know how you are supposed to be treated by your trusted office holder, you are going to find out that officer friendly is not respecting that.  Then you will find out that the local muni court is not going to respect that either.  After you get rammed through that court and find that nothing you told them or showed them has changed their mind, you appeal and find the very same deaf ear in the constitutionally created county court.  You will invariably come away from that journey with a bad taste in your mouth and the feeling that you are a subject rather than a free man or woman.  Don't be dismayed, it happens to nearly everyone and it doesn't seem to matter whether you declare that you are one of the sovereign people, or that you accept their charges for value, or that you have reserved your rights under UCC 1-308 or any of the other ingenious patriot assertions afoot on the internet.  

When I am pretty sure officer friendly has failed to respect my right of action, the muni court is not going to back me up as it should and I am about to be waylaid in the de novo appeal court, you can be sure I have given fair notice to officer friendly, the prosecutors, and the judges of the courts describing my right of action and his/her wrong doing .  Invariably they will ignore that notice. So have I wasted my time and paper by noticing them?  Probably not, in that it is well settled law that prior notice is sufficient evidence that they are aware of the lawful boundary of their grant of power respecting the office they hold.  When they ignore the notice and act beyond their authority they do so, not as an innocent party doing their duty but one who is, with willful and wanton intent, exceeding the confines of their office of trust.   That creates a couple of problems for them; first the act itself, when it causes a harm, is now a crime.  A crime is an intentional act that inures another, and second, causes them to lose subject matter jurisdiction and their further acts eject them from their office of trust respecting the immediate matter.  Now they are private citizens pretending to be acting with the authority of law (under color of law) and their governmental immunity is stripped from them.  That fact is made clear by the prior notice whether the court is willing to recognize it or not.  Of course we know; courts are willing to commit crimes in order to protect their fellow office holders.  We also know this happens far more than not. 

The reason our faithful office holders ignore our claim to freedom is because over many generations, the courts have claimed that the "General Welfare" authority of the Fed and State as written into the constitutions provide them with the power to compel or prohibit actions done by the individual people, even where no harm is associated, as it defines is in the best interest of the public (all the people collectively).  Did you watch the G. Edward Griffin video about the collective?  If you didn't, go back and watch it now.

While it is in our public interest not to injury one another it is clearly against public policy to take the freedom of one of us just in case one of us may injure someone.  This is clearly a collectivist concept and in America Socialism is a crime, as is the case with this general welfare claim of power ignoring property rights retained by the individual people respecting their own private life, liberty and property where no intent to injure is apparent.  Both are socialist elements and both are crimes in this American society.  Your neighbors, and maybe even you, have been convinced these crimes are necessary for your health, safety, morals, and welfare.  In America Socialism is a crime and every office holder that promotes or acquiesces to it is a criminal and must be brought to justice for that crime if we are to remain a free people.  It just isn't' the duty of the government to protect your neighbor from your acts.......... it is your duty to protect your neighbor from your acts and their duty to protect you from their acts and non-compliance with that duty is addressed one controversy at a time as injuries occur instead of allowing government to presume a non existent controversy and punish everyone.  

This is why the courts will ignore you and every other office holder will not assist you in protecting your property rights .  Fortunately, the rule of law in this land is still in your favor but you will have to pitch in and help enforce it as the courts no longer will.  As such, we must remind the courts of their duty and fortunately there is a lawful way to bind them to the rule of law.  Thank Roger Elvick and Bill Thornton for recognizing it after this entire society has forgotten.  The Great Charter of the Common law as altered for the nature of this society holds our salvation as it was intended to secure our rightful authority over government when the subject matter is your life, your liberty and your property.

At this point you will be well informed by Angela Starks conference with guest Bill Thornton, publisher/researcher of www.1215.org warning:  this is 4 hours of easy to understand common law application.  You will miss a lot if you miss this.  

In any event,  when office holders commit acts that would be crimes if they did so without governmental immunity, what you can do is to strip them of that immunity and expose their bad acts to the rule of law.  In that effort everything begins with lawful notice.  Notice is the tactical foundation for every defense of property and certainly of every defense against government overreaching.  

what are the notices?  Lets review with examples;

Notice to officer  (given at the time of the incident)

Affidavit of truth of Citizenship status (filed in the courts and copied to the prosecutor)  

Demand for Dismissal  (filed in the muni court (copied to prosecutor) and again in the de novo appeal court)

You are noticing them of the wrong they engage.  Once noticed they are subject to all that an honest man/woman would discover had they researched the law provided in the notice.   When they ignore your notice, all their acts thereafter that injure you are intentional injuries and you have evidence that they had notice of and therefore knew or should have known they were committing intentional acts that injured you.  You should know that this is only one element of your defense of your property.  The audio you should have listened to above featuring Angela Stark and Bill Thornton frames the second facet of your defense, which is actually now your first offensive action.

 

EMAIL   wdd@williamduff.com

 

 

Prior to that date this site was called Doprocess.net

Please email with any questions or concerns. I am not an attorney, yet many have asked for assistance, and I have given this with good results. If you feel you would like me as a consultant, please email me your concerns and issues you might need assistance with.  we also take credit cards and check by phone if you do not have a paypal account. My specialty is government over-reaching. Peace of mind is worth a second opinion often as well. Thanks for reading, Bill Duff

Or call 800-595-1313 and ask  Bill about donations