READ FIRST:   WEBSITE THESIS:

G. Edward Griffin's Commentary on Collectivism vs. Individualism provides an

on point rationale for the need for 

this website.

IN ORDER TO  REVERSE THIS TYRANNICAL COLLECTIVISM WE MUST UNDERSTAND AND APPLY THE INFORMATION PROVIDED ON THIS WEBSITE STARTING WITH THE AMERICAN BIRTHRIGHT

READ NEXT:  THE AMERICAN BIRTHRIGHT
2007 William Duff

AND THIS ONE:  SEEKING LIBERTY 2008 william duff

The facts and Law presented in the Seeking Liberty article are demonstrating the limits on State Police power that are described in Marshall vs Kansas city, Mo explained in part:  

Black's Law Dictionary, Sixth edition, page 1156:

Police power.   An authority conferred by the American constitutional system in the Tenth Amendment, U.S. Const., upon the individual states, and, in turn, delegated to local governments, through which they are enabled to establish a special department of police; adopt such laws and regulations as tend to prevent the commission of fraud and crime, and secure generally the comfort, safety, morals, health, and prosperity of the citizens by preserving the public order, preventing a conflict of rights in the common intercourse of the citizens, and insuring to each an uninterrupted enjoyment of all the privileges conferred upon him or her by the general laws.

The power of the State to place restraints on the personal freedom and property rights of persons for the protection of the public safety, health, and morals or the promotion of the public convenience and general prosperity.  The police power is subject to limitations of the federal and State constitutions, and especially to the requirement of due process.  Police power is the exercise of the sovereign right of a government to promote order, safety, security, health, morals and general welfare within constitutional limits and is an essential attribute of government.  Marshall v. Kansas City, Mo., 355 S.W.2d 877, 883.

THOSE LIMITS ARE CLEARLY THE PROHIBITION UPON INTRUDING UPON THE LIFE, LIBERTY AND PROPERTY BELONGING TO THE INDIVIDUAL PEOPLE.  ONLY A COLLECTIVIST WOULDN'T GET THAT.

TAKE THE TEST.

Article by: Joel Turtel : A MUST READ

READ THIRD:  SOLUTIONS

Now that you recognize the nature of your domain and your dominion over it the real work begins when you attempt to apply these principles to actions taken against you by governments and their subdivisions and agents respecting attempts to compel or prohibit your choice of action respecting subject matter that exists solely within your own private domain.  You now at least have a solid foundation upon which to proceed.  Here are the elements of your defense;

• You must destroy the State's belief that it has your IMPLIED CONSENT to regulate your private actions; your choices of use of your private property.  Recognizing the coerced and fraudulent nature of this presumed consent, you must rescind all powers of appointment with the local, state and federal governments, including all admissions you have given and agreements you have signed respecting all actions taken within your own private capacity, due to fraud and coercion.  In doing so, all such agreements become void from their origin.  The document I file is an AFFIDAVIT OF TRUTH.

• You must inform the plaintiff and the court of your AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE of SOVEREIGN IMMUNITY from all restraint initiated by the State or Local governments respecting acts it complains of that are your Rights of action and you must move the court to dismiss the plaintiff's charges for failure to state a claim upon which the court can lawfully provide remedy.

• You must be prepared to object to and rebut all evidence the plaintiff attempts to enter into the record that would nullify your initial filings (above).  This can be done thru a motion in Limine where you seek to limit evidence by the plaintiff to within the scope of law you have presented.

• You must demand a jury of your piers to decide the facts and law of the case.

• You must demand a court of record to first hear your case.

• You must demand discovery of facts such as the nature and cause of the accusation, admissions by plaintiff that your actions were not public or commercial in nature but in your private capacity.

• You must prepare yourself to testify to the facts you have brought to the court, even if that means that you read, verbatim, your affidavit of truth and your motion to dismiss via your affirmative defense.  It will be your job to educate the jury.

While it is important for you to file these documents in the municipal court prior to arraignment (first appearance), don't be surprised that it doesn't give your documents any credibility.  The muni court is typically an administrative court of NO record where you can receive NO jury or other important due process.  You will most likely need to appeal the decision of the muni court to the constitutionally created state court at the county level.

 

 

EMAIL   williamduff@kcm.com

Send what you can to assist the AOR (As of Right) group scream these principles in the courts when defending unjust regulations of those acting in their own private capacity but who are harming no one.

 

EVERYTHING ON THIS SITE IS FREE -  HOWEVER I DESPERATELY NEED YOUR ASSISTANCE AS I TAKE THESE ACTIONS TO THE COURTS FOR REMEDY.  Send what you can to  William Duff  108 NW 101 PL Kansas City, Mo. 64155 

or use paypal.com below

send to www.paypal.com C/O williamduff@kcm.com  You can use your credit/debit card through that PayPal system.

 

How to Send Money – 1, 2, 3

Sign up for a PayPal account Click the Send Money tab Enter an amount and recipient’s email It really is that simple

 

  Since 2-14-2007